Introduction
Infant mortality and morbidity are global health problems requiring strategic policy, programming, and investments. A report indicates 75% of all under-fives deaths occurred during their first year of life. Indeed, the leading medical causes of infant and child deaths are the acute childhood illnesses which include acute respiratory infections, diarrhea, malaria, and meningitis (WHO, 2015).1
The survival of an infant from the physical stressors associated with acute illness is dependent on identification of cues for the illness, time lag, and the decision to seek expert help by the caregiver “the so called health seeking behavior” (Olenja, 2003; Chandwani and Pandor, 2015).2, 3
Delay in seeking health care for a sick infant has been attributed to several factors for example, combining home remedies with conventional treatments, inability to identify life-threatening illnesses and lack of knowledge. These challenges exist against a background of undiagnosed serious life threatening illness such as diarrhea, malaria, and meningitis. The results for such unverified and/or not scientifically tested interventions are catastrophic with resultant mortality and/or complications (WHO, 2015).1
People tend to go to private practitioners in the belief that they provide rapid cure. Because of this the infants are devoid of getting high quality healthcare services offered by the hospitals and nurseries. The reason for this may be found by studying the behavioural pattern of parents. A significant gender differences in perception and treatment seeking for illness have been documented by some studies (Willis et al, 2009; Malhotra and Upadhyay, 2013).4, 5, 6
In India, there is a coexistence between the public and private health-care facilities. A vast majority of the parents seek health care from the private facilities. Government or public sector facilities were preferred less due to lack of trust in the doctors and poor care by doctors at the primary health-care level. Many parents treated their children at home and sought health care later on if the symptoms did not alleviate. It has been found that 22.8% of urban dwellers still seek health care from faith healers (Sreeramareddy et al, 2012; Shah et al, 2013).7, 8
The present study was conducted to study the morbidity profile of children under 5 years of age and knowledge of parents regarding their health seeking behavior.
Materials and Methods
The study was a community based cross sectional study. The study was conducted in the Field practice area of Rural Health Training Centre (RHTC) of Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki. Ethical clearance was sought by the Ethical Committee of the institute before starting commencement of the study. A total of 400 subjects were included in the study.
Families with at least one under five year child, all family willing to participate and consenting and families residing in the study site for the minimum last 1 year were included in the study. Family not willing to or not available for interview on account of absence or door-locked, families not having <5y old children, families not residing since 1 year and newborns were excluded from the study.
Methods
A predesigned and pretested semi-structured questionnaire which included the characteristics of respondents such as age of the respondent, sex of the respondent, type of family, literacy status, occupation of head of family, socio-economic status, religion, caste, health status of respondent, preference of the health care facility, reason for availing that particular health care facility were collected.
Results
Morbidity was almost nil in 0-2 months preceding the interview. Diarrhoea was most common morbidity during 2 months – 5 years preceding the interview (Table 1).
Government hospital for treatment was preferred by 53.5% of the respondents. Treatment at government hospital was taken by 55% of the respondents. Secondary level of care was available in 50.2% of the respondents (Table 2).
Table 1
Distribution of morbidity profile of children under 5 years of age
Table 2
Distribution of health seeking behavior of parents of their children
Table 3
Distribution of General use of health care facilities by parents
Table 4
Distribution of approaching health care facilities by parents
Only 2.2% of the respondents reported any problem with the treatment. Hospital was visited by 65% of the respondents for the treatment. Child’s last illness was 3-6 months in 52.8% of the respondents and Diarrhoea was the most common type of illness. 62.8% of the respondents visited government hospital for the treatment of child (Table 3).
More than one third of respondents visited health facility by bicycle (42.8%) and 24.5% approached by walking. Time taken to reach health facility was 15-30 minutes in 51% of the respondents. The main reason to choose particular health facility was Trust over the provider of the facility (41.5%) (Table 4).
Discussion
One of the key strategies of IMNCI is the education of the mothers/caregivers on the signs of severe illness for which the child should be immediately taken to the health facility. Prompt recognition and treatment with an effective drug have a crucial role in childhood pneumonia, as the case fatality rate in untreated children is high (sometimes exceeding 20%) and death can occur after 3 days of illness. The timings of the mother's decision to seek medical care depend on her and how family understands of the severity of the child condition (Minz et al, 2017).9
One tenth of care seeking involved self-medication through private pharmacies, typically as the only source of care though occasionally followed by facility-based care. While pharmacies may provide care for mild childhood illness (eg, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhea), the quality of services they provide is often low and has been linked with medication misuse (Smith, 2009; Porter and Grills, 2016).10, 11
In this study, morbidity was almost nil in 0-2 months preceding the interview. Diarrhoea was most common morbidity during 2 months – 5 years preceding the interview. Marsh et al (2020)12 found that fever was reported in 83% of instances of child illness, followed by cough (64%) and diarrhea (19%). Childhood illnesses were frequently multi-symptomatic (60%) with combined fever and cough accounting for half of all reported illness episodes. Minz et al (2017)9 found that out of total 1065 children surveyed, 240 children reported cough/cold within 2 weeks preceding the survey. Among these, 52 children had cough with difficult and/or fast breathing. The prevalence of childhood pneumonia (integrated management of neonatal and childhood illness [IMNCI]) was 4.9%, within 2 weeks preceding the survey.
In this study, only 2.2% of the respondents reported any problem with the treatment. Hospital was visited by 65% of the respondents for the treatment. Child’s last illness was 3-6 months in 52.8% of the respondents and Diarrhoea was the most common type of illness. 62.8% of the respondents visited government hospital for the treatment of child. Mittal et al (2018) reported that in the section of responses in reference to disease for which treatment is sought, maximum number of mothers responded that they would opt for home remedies for common illnesses; except for convulsions, where 46.5% mothers would prefer to visit a healthcare personnel. Similar was the response even in urban area in the study conducted by Friend-du Preez et al (2013), 13 where the care givers reported that they would resort to home remedies particularly for diarrhoea and constipation.
This study observed that government hospital for treatment was preferred by 53.5% of the respondents. Treatment at government hospital was taken by 55% of the respondents. Secondary level of care was available in 50.2% of the respondents. Mittal et al (2018) 14 reported that out of the 303 mothers interviewed, 108 (35.6%) preferred to go to Public health facility, 181(59.7%) endorsed private health provider and 4.6% i.e., 14 preferred traditional healer. Willis JR et al (2009), in their study reported that 75% of the mother stated that private healthcare providers (qualified or otherwise) were best. Whereas, only 16% said that public care providers are best. The percentage of mother preferring private health provider over public health provider was very high in the study of Willis JR et al (2009) as compared to our study (75% vs 44.5% in the present study). Corresponding percentage for preference of public health provider in present study (53.5%) was more than that observed by Willis JR et al (2009) (16%). Marsh et al (2020) reported that care was sought from a health facility during 71% of illness episodes overall, increasing from 47% for non-severe illness to 88% for somewhat severe illness and 100% for very severe illness. Care was primarily sought from the private sector across all severity strata with all episodes of very severe illness seeking care exclusively from the private sector.
There are two medical colleges in nearby where the study was conducted including this college. Also the study was carried out in villages adopted by the Department as a part of comprehensive health services. Hence frequent visits by the social worker and Medical students might have helped in developing confidence in healthcare facilities. Deshmukh PR et al (2009) 15 in their post survey Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with mothers have mentioned that one of the important cause for not accessing government health facilities was lack of faith in government health services. And the reasons stated being unavailability of doctors at the primary healthcare level like subcentres/ primary health centres, at the tertiary level poor care by doctors and nurses, lack of medicines and equipments and finally no relief with the treatment offered at these centers.
In the present study, more than one third of respondents visited health facility by bicycle (42.8%) and 24.5% approached by walking. Time taken to reach health facility was 15-30 minutes in 51% of the respondents. The main reason to choose particular health facility was Trust over the provider of the facility (41.5%). Pandey A et al (2002), 16 from the study in rural community of West Bengal, where they concluded that parents travelled longer distances (3.3 km for boys vs. 1.6 km for girls) to consult qualified health professionals more often (p=0.0094) for boys.
In the study by Marsh et al (2020), 12 the most common care-seeking pattern overall and within each illness stratum was a single visit to a private provider, accounting for two thirds of care-seeking for non-severe cases and increasing to 79% among very severe cases. The second most common pattern overall and among somewhat severe and very severe cases was care-seeking from two or more private sector providers, while the second most common pattern for non-severe illness was care-seeking exclusively from pharmacies and drugstores (18%).
There were some limitations of this study. The study was conducted only among rural population and not included urban population. There might have been an investigator effect. The mothers might have told mostly the desirable things about traditional practices and that the possibility of misunderstanding of common local terms while entering it into the questionnaire.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the importance of maternal perception of illness severity in determining facility based care seeking for childhood illness in rural area.
Article DOI
